Drs. Jean Bousquet, MD, and Marc E. Rothenberg, MD, PhD, bring you breaking news and the latest research of interest to the allergy/immunology community.
Search This Blog
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
World Primary Immunodeficiencies Week 2012
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Do we need antibiotics in acute rhinosinusitis?
art methodology for developing evidence-based guidelines. The paper is published in Clinical Infectious Diseases (Clin Infect Dis 2012; doi: 10.1093/cid/cir1043). The guidelines aim to provide clarity and guidance that will aid physicians in diagnosis and treatment of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis, both in children and in adults. As the guidelines point out, no clinical criteria can currently differentiate between viral and bacterial rhinosinusitis, which leads to excessive antimicrobial therapy. The authors propose an algorithm for management that is based on risk assessment for antimicrobial resistance and evolution of clinical responses.
Thursday, March 29, 2012
Telemonitoring in asthma: Fact or fancy?
Asthma plans are widely used to help patients control their disease. It is thought that such plans have had a major impact on the reduction of hospitalizations and deaths seen in many countries. Telemonitoring may provide an additional benefit but its effectiveness has not been tested in a large study. In a newly published study, Ryan et al (BMJ, 2012 Mar 23;344:e1756) followed 288 adolescents and adults with poorly controlled asthma seen in primary care in the UK. Mobile-phone-based monitoring was compared with standard paper-based monitoring strategies. After 6 months, the authors found that the control of asthma, acute exacerbations, oral corticosteroid courses and unscheduled visits were not improved in the group followed by cell phones by comparison to the control group. The authors conclude that “Mobile technology does not improve asthma control or increase self efficacy compared with paper based monitoring when both groups received clinical care to guidelines standards. The mobile technology was not cost effective.”
Are you using telemonitoring? If so, what have you observed?
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Do we need antibiotics in acute rhinosinusitis?
This is a major question to be answered. In the US, one out of every five antibiotic prescriptions is for rhinosinusitis. However, results of studies are inconsistent and clinical benefit with antibiotic treatment is at best small due to the high rate of spontaneous improvement. The vast majority of patients are seen in primary care. The recent study by Garbutt et al (JAMA 2012;307:685-692) is therefore of major interest since it attempts to find the incremental effect of amoxicillin over symptomatic treatment on quality of life in 166 adults clinically diagnosed with acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (7 to 28 days of symptoms). They found that antibiotic treatment was not better than placebo for the control of symptoms after 3 days of treatment whereas some benefit was found after 7 days. Although a true diagnosis of sinusitis was not made, this study reflects primary care practice. Since antibiotic resistance is common, the authors propose "to avoid routine antibiotic treatment for patients with uncomplicated acute rhinosinusitis." What do you think based on your experience?
Tuesday, January 3, 2012
How Best to Care for Children with Allergies
The journal Archives of Disease in Childhood has recently published a supplement containing a series of articles focused on developing care pathways for children with allergies. The articles represent an attempt by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) Science and Research Department to develop national care pathways for these children, as requested by the UK Department of Health. The articles each focus on a different condition:
- Anaphylaxis
- Asthma and/or rhinitis
- Drug allergies
- Eczema
- Food allergy
- Latex allergies
- Urticaria, angioedema, or mastocytosis
- Venom allergies
Tuesday, December 27, 2011
How Best to Care for Children with Allergies
The journal Archives of Disease in Childhood has recently published a supplement containing a series of articles focused on developing care pathways for children with allergies. The articles represent an effort by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) Science and Research Department to develop national care pathways for these children, as requested by the UK Department of Health. The articles each focus on a different condition:
- Anaphylaxis
- Asthma and/or rhinitis
- Drug allergies
- Eczema
- Food allergy
- Latex allergies
- Urticaria, angioedema, or mastocytosis
- Venom allergies
Each article presents a pathway algorithm and a set of competences that are required to deliver high-quality care. They are intended as “a guide for training and development of services to facilitate improvements in delivery as close to the patient's home as possible.” The authors note that the pathways should be implemented by a multidisciplinary team, at a local level, and with an eye to establishing connections between primary, secondary, and tertiary care.
Thursday, December 8, 2011
Council of the European Union adopts conclusions on chronic respiratory diseases in children
On December 2, the Council of the European Union adopted a set of conclusions regarding "Prevention, early diagnosis and treatment of chronic respiratory diseases in children." This topic had been identified by the Polish Presidency of the EU as one of its public health priorities. According to the press release, the conclusions urge member states “to give appropriate consideration to the prevention, early diagnosis and treatment of chronic respiratory diseases in children in their health programmes” and “to increase public awareness of these diseases, strengthen smoking prevention and cessation programmes for pregnant women and follow the Council recommendation on smoke-free environment.” In addition, the Council asks the Commission “to support member states in developing and implementing effective policies on the prevention of chronic respiratory diseases in children, improving networking among institutions responsible for the implementation of member states' programmes, and strengthening cooperation of national centres and reinforcing existing international research networks.”